
I am appointing myself the unofficial official psycho therapist for the paranormal community. This is the first of, potentially, a number of blog posts on this topic. Or, maybe it will only be one. Time will tell.
Over the past six months or so I have started listening to paranormal themed
podcasts as a form of
entertainment. I used to be interested in the paranormal, many years ago, then I became bored with it when I realized that we will never really know anything about it one way or the other. Time passed, and once I got my
Iphone I started downloading
podcasts to listen to. I first downloaded '
The Paracast' and found that I enjoyed listening to the
conversations and discussions about UFOs and how they may, or may not, fit into consensus reality. Next, I discovered '
The Culture of Contact' and became a major fan-boy of Jeremy
Vanei.
Listening to these
podcasts is a pretty interesting experience. You hear these
conversations, arguments, and debates and, often times, want to make your own point of view known as well. Most
podcasts also support message forums but I find that I rarely participate in message forums any more. They take a great deal of time, effort, and energy. Heck, I even run my own message forum that I never participate in any more.
Jeremy
Vanei is a unique character. He might well be funny enough to be a stand-up comedian. He's certainly funnier than a lot of bad acts I have seen at the comedy club I frequent on a regular basis. He is also humble, self deprecating, and a genuinely interesting and nice guy. When you listen to his podcast he 'brings you in' and makes you feel as though you are having a one on one direct
conversation about his most intimate thoughts and feelings.
It is for this reason that, upon listening to
Jeremey, I felt compelled to just call him on the telephone. After all, why not, I had just heard his most intimate thoughts and feelings, shouldn't we be able to chat? And, we did. Which only endeared him to me some more.
But, enough about
Jeremey.
Jeremey is not what is wrong with paranormal
podcasts, he is what is right with them. Everyone else, on the other hand, appears to have some issues.
First of all, I must be open, honest, and forthright about where I am coming from. While I am somewhat interested in the subject of paranormal phenomena and how they may, or may not, intersect consensus reality, that really isn't my main motivation.
What fascinates me, what truly drives me mad with curiosity, is why people believe the crazy shit that they do. Earlier in my life, my key fascination was with organized religions. It truly blew me away why people would believe in the dogma of a particular religious faith. I used to spend untold hours arguing with people about it. My bookshelves and personal library was overflowing with books on all of the world religions, not only their spiritual documents but also historical research as well. I would, and probably still could, argue the finer points of the
idiosyncratic beliefs of all of the worlds religions.
But, then I decided to join Freemasonry where one of our key tenets is to tolerate the religious beliefs of others. That was a big one for me to swallow. I had spent literally decades honing my rhetorical skills debating Internet zealots on the absurdities of their particular religious beliefs.
Nevertheless, I decided to let it go. It has been hard, in some ways, but still I let it go. Today I reserve the right to debate any individual, one on one, about any particular religious belief they might have. However, I no longer
intentionally seek out that debate or revel in the joy of instigating ontological shock and awe as I devastate the beliefs of others with a flurry of logic, reason, rhetoric and fact.
Today, I reserve that right for those who believe in the paranormal. It is not, technically speaking, a religion, and therefore I do not violate my vow as a Freemason when I engage in civil, or even uncivil, debate on the topic.
I won't belabor the issue here, but I must be clear where my point of view comes from. Today my perspective on all things paranormal, or reality based in general, stems from reading the writings of Robert Anton Wilson over the years. If you haven't read the writings of RAW, well you are truly doing yourself a disservice.
Now, getting down to business, let us discuss the paranormal
podcasts and their problems. The podcast I listen to the most lately is '
Paratopia' by Jeremy
Vanei and Jeff
Ritzmann. Both Jeremy and Jeff claim to be '
experiencers of high strangeness'. Now, I'm not one to question them about their strange experiences; after all they happened to them, not me, and they never seem to assume that whatever happened to them has anything to do with me, so we are cool on that account.
As I said before, Jeremy is a pretty funny guy, and doesn't take himself too seriously. Jeff seems to take himself a bit more seriously. He often harbours some strong opinions about what is or isn't possible, in some
hypothetical consensus reality, and sometimes I feel like he could loosen up a little bit. Both Jeremy and Jeff recently
experimented with some
consciousness altering compounds in an effort to gain a greater
understanding of their own experiences. My hat is off to both of them for conducting this supreme personal scientific experiment. No great knowledge was revealed during that experiment but I still respect them
tremendously for making the effort.
The other podcast of
significance is '
The Paracast' with Gene
Steinberg and David
Biedny. If you are interested in the paranormal, or more
specifically with UFOs in particular, this is probably the best podcast out there for information on the topic. They have great guests and produce a very
professional show.
Unfortunately, unlike
Paratopia, the
Paracast seems to have lost its sense of humour. On the one hand, the show prides itself on being logical, rational, reasonable, and unwilling to put up with any bullshit. On the other hand, it could lighten up a bit. On a recent episode David
Biedny proclaimed that he couldn't understand why anyone could fault him for simply being rational and critical in his
interviewing style. The problem is that, apparently, David is unable to distinguish what he is saying with the tone of voice in which he says it with.
Maybe I'm fooling myself? I don't know. I would like to do an experiment. Could I do an interview with someone who was bat shit crazy insane, but do it in a way where I wouldn't have to resort to extreme sarcasm and direct attacks? Maybe? Probably not. I'm not sure. Then again, I regularly spend a lot of time with lovely New Age people (on purpose), lovely New Age people who believe all kinds of bat shit crazy things. I spend time with them because they are lovely people, give me hugs, good vibes, warmth, love, and a relaxing and pleasant evening. It harms me not if they believe ridiculous things without rhyme or reason. The hugs feel just as good either way.
So, my advice to David
Biedny, is watch your tone. Feel free to ask critical questions. Repeatedly ask the person you are
interviewing why they believe what they believe; what evidence do they have that they can share? Can David interview a wacko nut job and question them at every turn but still maintain a civil tone and sense of decorum?
I don't know for sure, but here is some advice I would give him.
I know David has read Robert Anton Wilson, as have I. One of the most liberating concepts RAW presented is the idea of the 'multi-model agnostic'.
To me, a multi-model agnostic is a person who doesn't technically 'believe' anything. Instead he holds within his mind a great number of models. He is able to try these models on like a set of clothing. He could attend a New Age ceremony, let's say a Reiki share and, the entire time, act as if it was a perfectly natural and correct thing to do. He could suspend disbelief and simply embrace the experience on its own terms. It is no threat to his personal psyche to participate in this ritual and, in fact, the experience ultimately provides individual growth.
In my own past I have attended not only New Age ceremonies but also the rituals of numerous world religions. When trying to understand a particular phenomenon, I can
conceptually apply a wide array of models against it; temporarily ignoring any cognitive dissonance that might occur as I explore the range of ideas that arise from the exercise.
As I said before, this is just the first of a number of posts I may make on this topic. Or, perhaps, I will only post this one as the mood strikes me. I would just like to end this first post with a bit of advice for those who follow this subject matter.
(1) You know how dumb the average person is? Well, by definition half the people in the world are dumber than that. I've said this before and I will most likely say it again, because it is terribly true. The reality of the situation is that most people in the world do not apply a tremendous amount of logic, reason, rational thought, or scientific rigor to their belief systems.
Stop getting upset and frustrated about it. Just admit it, and move on.
(2) People in the United States of America have a legal right to believe pretty much any damned thing they want. In fact, I'm pretty sure that so long as they don't voice it in public, or take direct action on their beliefs, they can, in fact, legally believe literally anything they want so long as it harms no others.
Here's a simple case in point. I can believe that
ethnogenic compounds should be legal. I can not only believe it, I can even say it, loud and
publically. So long as I do not actually consume
enthogenic compounds I have broken no laws.
Freedom of speech is pretty broad until it enters into the realm of hate speech or libel. In between that, saying you believe in UFOs, space aliens, reptilians, or wacky conspiracy theories is all still perfectly legal.
The point I am trying to make here is that, at a certain point, you have to realize that your own personal pursuit of truth and
understanding need not be deterred by the irrational beliefs of others.
(3) You must come to terms with the fact that you will almost absolutely for certain never know, understand, or have revealed to you any great mysteries of the Universe. The number of people who have gone to their grave never getting any answer to the deep mysteries of life, the Universe, and everything indicates strongly that quite likely, so will you.
You will almost for certain never know what UFOs are, where they come from, what they mean, or why they are here. There is a reason the people who believe they may have been abducted by aliens also believe their memories were erased. These phenomena, the best that we can tell, go to great lengths to make certain that the mystery is maintained.
Admit to yourself that you will almost for certain never get any real answers to any of this. Come to grips with it. Embrace it. That doesn't mean you cannot enjoy the journey or the mystery of trying to expand your
understanding and knowledge, but, for Pete's sake, don't let it eat you up or corrupt you.
(4) The US government is not part of the UFO cover-up. The UFO is in control of the UFO cover-up and the sooner you come to terms with that the better.
(5) If somebody really did have access to a
sekrit 'free energy' device, chances are good that it is kept
sekrit for a reason. First of all, free energy devices are, as far as we know, impossible. For centuries people have been trying to invent free energy devices and they have Universally all been abject failures. Any free energy device would violate the known laws of physics and there is little reason to believe that any such device has ever existed or could exist.
All that said, let's say a free energy device were possible, by tapping into the
hypothetical zero point energy field or, say the nocturnal emissions of pink unicorns. Whatever the case, if such a device existed it could just as easily
destroy the world as fuel your home. So, maybe it's a good thing somebody is suppressing it?
(6) UFOs are not important. Yep, you heard it here first. They are not important. Are they
intellectual interesting? Yes. A curiosity? No doubt. But, are they important? No, not really. The sooner you realize this, the better off you will be.
Look, I've rambled along enough here, I'm just trying to say that studying the paranormal is an interesting topic. As I have said before, almost by definition, 'the paranormal' is a lot more interesting than the 'normal'. To the skeptics in the world, if you haven't figured out yet that to a
substantial percentage of the human population, from time to time, 'weird shit happens', then you are not part of the same reality we are dealing with here.
If you want to find a better way to deal with and cope with these complex topics, again, I cannot recommend reading the collected work of Robert Anton Wilson enough; in my personal opinion the greatest philosopher of the past century.
And, to the people out there in podcast land getting all upset about this stuff, I implore you to follow the path of young Jeremy
Vanei. Maintain a great sense of humour and don't take yourself too seriously.